United States v. Coleman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 319 F. App'x 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 8, 2010·No. 09-6910·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6910

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM BERRY COLEMAN, a/k/a William Barry Coleman,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00093-RLV-1)

Submitted: March 24, 2010 Decided: April 8, 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Berry Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Berry Coleman appeals the district court’s

order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Coleman, No. 3:01-cr-00093-

RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. April 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Coleman, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Coleman (United States v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related