United States v. Coleman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6910
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM BERRY COLEMAN, a/k/a William Barry Coleman,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00093-RLV-1)
Submitted: March 24, 2010 Decided: April 8, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Berry Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
William Berry Coleman appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Coleman, No. 3:01-cr-00093-
RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. April 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Coleman (United States v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.