United States v. Coleman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Coleman. Read the opinion of the Court — 319 F. App'x 228
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2009·No. 09-6012·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MARTEZ MANDEL COLEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:01-cr-00506-JFA-4)

Submitted: April 17, 2009 Decided: May 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martez Mandel Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Mark C. Moore, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Martez Mandel Coleman appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Coleman, No. 3:01-cr-00506-JFA-4 (D.S.C. Dec. 15, 2008); see

also United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009),

petition for cert. filed (Mar. 20, 2009) (No. 08-1185). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Coleman, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Coleman (United States v. Coleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)