United States v. Claxton
76 M.J. 121, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 78
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 3, 2017
DocketNo. 17-0148/AF
StatusPublished
This text of 76 M.J. 121 (United States v. Claxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Claxton, 76 M.J. 121, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 78 (Ark. 2017).
Opinion
CCA 38188. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:
I. WHETHER THE FINDINGS AND SENTENCE MUST BE SET ASIDE IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. HILLS, 75 M.J. 350 (C.A.A.F. 2016).
II. WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THAT AIR FORCE ACADEMY CADET E.T. WAS A CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT FOR THE AIR FORCE OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS (AFOSI) PURSUANT TO BEADY v. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), WAS HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
United States v. Hills
75 M.J. 350 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 121, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-claxton-armfor-2017.