United States v. Claxton

76 M.J. 121, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 78
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Claxton. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 M.J. 478
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided February 3, 2017·No. No. 17-0148/AF·Published

Opinion

CCA 38188. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER THE FINDINGS AND SENTENCE MUST BE SET ASIDE IN LIGHT OF UNITED STATES v. HILLS, 75 M.J. 350 (C.A.A.F. 2016).
II. WHETHER THE GOVERNMENT’S FAILURE TO DISCLOSE THAT AIR FORCE ACADEMY CADET E.T. WAS A CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT FOR THE AIR FORCE OFFICE OF SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS (AFOSI) PURSUANT TO BEADY v. MARYLAND, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), WAS HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Claxton, 76 M.J. 121, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 78 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 121 (United States v. Claxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
United States v. Hills
75 M.J. 350 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2016)