United States v. Claxton
76 M.J. 341, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 543
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Claxton. Read the opinion of the Court — 76 M.J. 356 →
Opinion
CCA 38188. On consideration of Appellant’s motion to close the courtroom for oral argument and the response of the [342]*342government not opposing said motion, it is ordered that said motion is hereby denied. All parties will refer to the second confidential informant as “CI2” if necessary to the presentation of counsel’s oral argument on the assigned issue. The Clerk is directed to seal Appellant’s reply brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Claxton, 76 M.J. 341, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 543 (Ark. 2017).
76 M.J. 341 (United States v. Claxton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.