United States v. Clarke

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2009
Docket08-7840
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Clarke (United States v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Clarke, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7840

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

KEITHROY NOEL CLARKE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:97-cr-00166-RBS-4)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 20, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keithroy Noel Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keithroy Noel Clarke appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v.

Clarke, No. 2:97-cr-00166-RBS-4 (E.D. Va. filed July 31, 2008;

entered Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and oral argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Clarke, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-clarke-ca4-2009.