United States v. Clarke

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Clarke

307 F. App'x 755

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Clarke. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F. App'x 831 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2009·No. No. 08-7840·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keithroy Noel Clarke appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Clarke, No. 2:97-cr-00166-RBS-4 (E.D.Va. filed July 31, 2008; entered Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Keithroy Noel Clarke appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. United States v. Clarke, No. 2:97-cr-00166-RBS-4 (E.D.Va. filed July 31, 2008; entered Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and oral argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Clarke, 307 F. App'x 755 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

307 F. App'x 755 (United States v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related