United States v. Clarke

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Clarke. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F. App'x 831
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2007·No. 07-7312·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7312

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEITHROY NOEL CLARKE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:97-cr-00166-RBS)

Submitted: December 20, 2007 Decided: December 28, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keithroy Noel Clarke, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keithroy Noel Clarke appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for “administrative habeas corpus and petition

for immediate release.” We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.

Clarke, No. 2:97-cr-00166-RBS (E.D. Va. July 27, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clarke, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Clarke (United States v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.