United States v. Clarke

259 F. App'x 617
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Clarke. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F. App'x 831
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 28, 2007·No. No. 07-7312·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Keithroy Noel Clarke appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for “administrative habeas corpus and petition for immediate release.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Clarke, No. 2:97-cr-00166-RBS (E.D.Va. July 27, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Clarke, 259 F. App'x 617 (4th Cir. 2007).

259 F. App'x 617 (United States v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.