United States v. Chase
327 F. App'x 400
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chase. Read the opinion of the Court — 466 F.3d 310 →
Opinion
Emilio Chase appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase, No. 3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W.Va. Feb. 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Chase, 327 F. App'x 400 (4th Cir. 2009).
327 F. App'x 400 (United States v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Imposition of a sentence of imprisonment
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)