United States v. Chase

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chase. Read the opinion of the Court — 466 F.3d 310
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 18, 2008·No. 08-8063·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8063

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

CLYNTON JOHN CHASE,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:91-cr-00086-GCM-2)

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 18, 2008

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claire J. Rauscher, Federal Public Defender, Tanzania Chevon Cannon-Eckerle, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Steven George Slawinski, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Adam Christopher Morris, C. Nicks Williams, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Michael E. Savage, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clynton John Chase appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence under

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase

No. 3:91-cr-00086-GCM-2 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 18, 2008). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chase, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Chase (United States v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related