United States v. Chase

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Chase. Read the opinion of the Court — 466 F.3d 310
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 24, 2009·No. 09-6377·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6377

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EMILIO CHASE, a/k/a E, a/k/a Dominic Mario Chase,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 24, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished by per curiam opinion.

Emilio Chase, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Emilio Chase appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Chase,

No. 3:04-cr-00042-JPB-JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 20, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Chase, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Chase (United States v. Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related