United States v. Burgess

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Burgess

65 F. App'x 504

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 6, 2003·No. 03-6591·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda Viola Burgess appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to modify her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United, States v. Burgess, No. CR-00-162 A (E.D.Va. Apr. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda Viola Burgess appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to modify her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United, States v. Burgess, No. CR-00-162 A (E.D.Va. Apr. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Burgess, 65 F. App'x 504 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

65 F. App'x 504 (United States v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related