United States v. Burgess
This text of 30 F. App'x 201 (United States v. Burgess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these consolidated appeals, Yolanda Viola Burgess seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying her motions for provision of transcripts. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s [202]*202opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis but affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Burgess, No. CR-00-162-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2001; Nov. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F. App'x 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burgess-ca4-2002.