United States v. Burgess

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7928

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

YOLANDA VIOLA BURGESS,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-7991

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-00-162-A)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 6, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yolanda Viola Burgess, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Riley Pedersen, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Yolanda Viola Burgess seeks to

appeal the district court’s orders denying her motions for provi-

sion of transcripts. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis but affirm on the reason-

ing of the district court. See United States v. Burgess, No. CR-

00-162-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2001; Nov. 6, 2001). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED