United States v. Branch

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Branch. Read the opinion of the Court — 537 F.3d 328
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 30, 2009·No. 08-7974·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7974

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

YUDELL AMON BRANCH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00134-RGD-JEB-1)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yudell Amon Branch, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Yudell Amon Branch appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the

motion. See United States v. Lindsey, 556 F.3d 238, 244-46 (4th

Cir. 2009); United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 232-33 (4th

Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Branch, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Branch (United States v. Branch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Lindsey
556 F.3d 238 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Hood
556 F.3d 226 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)