United States v. Branch

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Branch

398 F. App'x 857

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Branch. Read the opinion of the Court — 537 F.3d 328 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2010·No. No. 10-6083·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Lawrence Branch appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Branch, No. l:05-cr-00016-CCB-l, 2009 WL 5178303 (D.Md. Dec. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Lawrence Branch appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Branch, No. l:05-cr-00016-CCB-l, 2009 WL 5178303 (D.Md. Dec. 30, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Branch, 398 F. App'x 857 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

398 F. App'x 857 (United States v. Branch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related