United States v. Branch
This text of United States v. Branch (United States v. Branch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7974
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
YUDELL AMON BRANCH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (4:03-cr-00134-RGD-JEB-1)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: April 30, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yudell Amon Branch, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Yudell Amon Branch appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order denying the
motion. See United States v. Lindsey, 556 F.3d 238, 244-46 (4th
Cir. 2009); United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 232-33 (4th
Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Branch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-branch-ca4-2009.