United States v. Bowens

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bowens

334 F. App'x 533

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bowens. Read the opinion of the Court — 425 F. App'x 205 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2009·No. No. 09-7407·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Javelle Bowens appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and reducing his sentence to 118 months in prison. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Bowens, No. 5:02-cr-00037-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. July 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Javelle Bowens appeals the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and reducing his sentence to 118 months in prison. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Bowens, No. 5:02-cr-00037-RLV-1 (W.D.N.C. July 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bowens, 334 F. App'x 533 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

334 F. App'x 533 (United States v. Bowens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related