United States v. Bowens

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2009
Docket09-7407
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Bowens (United States v. Bowens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bowens, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7407

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TYRONE JAVELLE BOWENS, a/k/a Ty,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00037-RLV-1)

Submitted: October 1, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Javelle Bowens, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Javelle Bowens appeals the district court’s

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and

reducing his sentence to 118 months in prison. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm. United States v. Bowens, No. 5:02-cr-00037-RLV-1

(W.D.N.C. July 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Bowens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bowens-ca4-2009.