United States v. Bowens
This text of United States v. Bowens (United States v. Bowens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7407
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
TYRONE JAVELLE BOWENS, a/k/a Ty,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00037-RLV-1)
Submitted: October 1, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Javelle Bowens, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Tyrone Javelle Bowens appeals the district court’s
order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and
reducing his sentence to 118 months in prison. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm. United States v. Bowens, No. 5:02-cr-00037-RLV-1
(W.D.N.C. July 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Bowens, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bowens-ca4-2009.