United States v. Bowens

213 F. App'x 163
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2007·No. No. 06-7020·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Javelle Bowens appeals the district court’s order denying Bowens’ 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion, which we construe as an untimely motion to reconsider the district court’s order granting the United States’ Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion and reducing Bowens’ sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bowens, 213 F. App'x 163 (4th Cir. 2007).

213 F. App'x 163 (United States v. Bowens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related