United States v. Bowens

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2007·No. 06-7020·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYRONE JAVELLE BOWENS, a/k/a Ty,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00037-1)

Submitted: December 13, 2006 Decided: January 11, 2007

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Javelle Bowens, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Matthew Theodore Martens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Javelle Bowens appeals the district court’s order

denying Bowens’ 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) motion, which we construe as an

untimely motion to reconsider the district court’s order granting

the United States’ Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion and reducing

Bowens’ sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bowens, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Bowens (United States v. Bowens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related