United States v. Black

389 F. App'x 314
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Black. Read the opinion of the Court — 525 F.3d 359
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2010·No. No. 09-8001·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Black appeals the district court’s order denying Black’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Amendment 599 of the sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and conclude that Amendment 599 does not apply to Black’s sentence and that he is therefore not entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Black, 389 F. App'x 314 (4th Cir. 2010).

389 F. App'x 314 (United States v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related