United States v. Black
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8001
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JERMAINE BLACK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:97-cr-00031-FDW-1)
Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 29, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jermaine Black, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jermaine Black appeals the district court’s order
denying Black’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for
reduction of sentence pursuant to Amendment 599 of the
sentencing guidelines. We have reviewed the record and conclude
that Amendment 599 does not apply to Black’s sentence and that
he is therefore not entitled to relief under § 3582(c)(2). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Black (United States v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.