United States v. Black

371 F. App'x 415
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Black. Read the opinion of the Court — 525 F.3d 359
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2010·No. No. 10-6092·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Black appeals the district court’s order denying Black’s motion for sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Black, No. 2:94-cr-00015-BO-9 (E.D.N.C. filed Dec. 17, 2009; entered Dec. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Black, 371 F. App'x 415 (4th Cir. 2010).

371 F. App'x 415 (United States v. Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related