United States v. Alexander

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alexander. Read the opinion of the Court — 247 F. App'x 416
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 25, 2009·No. 09-7510·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7510

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY B. ALEXANDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00178-MR)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tony Alexander appeals from the district court’s order

granting in part his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), but denying his motion to the

extent that Alexander sought a resentencing. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Alexander, No. 3:95-cr-00178-MR (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2009); see

United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 257 (4th Cir.), cert.

denied, 129 S. Ct. 2401 (2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alexander, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Alexander (United States v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)