United States v. Alexander

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4813

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES RILEY ALEXANDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (3:92-cr-00053-2)

Submitted: March 30, 2007 Decided: May 4, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Adolf, FEDERAL DEFENDERS OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Amy E. Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Riley Alexander was found guilty of violating his

supervised release and was sentenced to sixty months of

imprisonment, the top of his advisory Sentencing Guidelines range.

On appeal, Alexander alleges that his sentence was erroneous.

Because we find that Alexander’s sentence is not plainly

unreasonable, United States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 437 (4th Cir.

2006) (stating review standard), we affirm. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -