United States v. Alexander

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 16, 2009
• Docket: 09-7170
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7170

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

COREY EUGENE ALEXANDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K, Reidinger, District Judge. (3:01-cr-00216-MR-1)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Eugene Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Corey Eugene Alexander appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 3:01-cr-

00216-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 11, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED