United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Ahrens
52 N.W. 898, 50 Minn. 332, 1892 Minn. LEXIS 310
Opinion
It was held many years ago in Rogers v. Holy olee, 14 Minn. 514, (Gil. 387,) that an order for judgment on the pleadings was nonappealable. See, also, Croft v. Miller, 26 Minn. 317, (4 N. W. Rep. 45,) and cases cited. The point is not made by counsel for respondent, but, following the uniform practice of this court under like circumstances, the appeal is hereby dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Ahrens, 52 N.W. 898, 50 Minn. 332, 1892 Minn. LEXIS 310 (Mich. 1892).
52 N.W. 898 (United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Ahrens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis
128 N.W. 669 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
Gottstein v. St. Jean
82 N.W. 311 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1900)
Minnehaha Driving Park Ass'n v. Legg
52 N.W. 898 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1892)