Gottstein v. St. Jean
82 N.W. 311, 79 Minn. 232, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 756
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the action for want of prosecution; in effect an order for judgment in defendant’s favor for his costs and disbursements. As early as 1872 this court held that an appeal would not lie from an order of dismissal (Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 285 [316]), and this rule has been adhered to ever since. The point has not been made by respondent’s counsel, but this is immaterial. U. S. Savings, L. & B. Co. v. Ahrens, 50 Minn. 332, 52 N. W. 898.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gottstein v. St. Jean, 82 N.W. 311, 79 Minn. 232, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 756 (Mich. 1900).
82 N.W. 311 (Gottstein v. St. Jean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Royal Realty Co. v. Levin
66 N.W.2d 5 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1954)
Quevli v. First National Bank of Windom
32 N.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1948)
State v. McBride
9 N.W.2d 416 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1943)
Bulau v. Bulau
294 N.W. 845 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1940)
Long v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance
253 N.W. 762 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1934)
Anderson v. Langula
230 N.W. 645 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)
County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis
128 N.W. 669 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1910)
Poirier v. Martin
94 N.W. 865 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1903)