Gottstein v. St. Jean

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Gottstein v. St. Jean

82 N.W. 311, 79 Minn. 232, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 756

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 6, 1900

DocketNos. 11,979-(125)

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 82 N.W. 311 (Gottstein v. St. Jean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gottstein v. St. Jean, 82 N.W. 311, 79 Minn. 232, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 756 (Mich. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER OURIAM.

Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the action for want of prosecution; in effect an order for judgment in defendant’s favor for his costs and disbursements. As early as 1872 this court held that an appeal would not lie from an order of dismissal (Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 285 [316]), and this rule has been adhered to ever since. The point has not been made by respondent’s counsel, but this is immaterial. U. S. Savings, L. & B. Co. v. Ahrens, 50 Minn. 332, 52 N. W. 898.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER OURIAM.

Appeal from an order of the district court dismissing the action for want of prosecution; in effect an order for judgment in defendant’s favor for his costs and disbursements. As early as 1872 this court held that an appeal would not lie from an order of dismissal (Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 285 [316]), and this rule has been adhered to ever since. The point has not been made by respondent’s counsel, but this is immaterial. U. S. Savings, L. & B. Co. v. Ahrens, 50 Minn. 332, 52 N. W. 898.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 N.W. 311, 79 Minn. 232, 1900 Minn. LEXIS 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gottstein-v-st-jean-minn-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack