County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis
This text of 128 N.W. 669 (County of Renville v. City of Minneapolis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order directing judgment upon the pleadings in defendant’s favor. The order is not appealable, and this court is therefore without jurisdiction. We could not enter upon a consideration of the merits of this case without overruling a well-established rule, as shown by a long line of decisions of this court. Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 385 (513) ; Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 387 (514); Hodgins v. Heaney, 15 Minn. 142 (185); Lockwood v. Bock, 46 Minn. 73, 48 N. W. 458. In U. S. S. L. & B. Co. v. Ahrens, 50 Minn. 332, 52 N. W. 898, it was said: “The point is not made by counsel for respondent, but, following the uniform practice of this court under like circumstances, the appeal is hereby dismissed.” See also Gottstein v. St. Jean, 79 Minn. 232, 82 N. W. 311.
The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 N.W. 669, 112 Minn. 487, 1910 Minn. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-renville-v-city-of-minneapolis-minn-1910.