Croft v. Miller

4 N.W. 45, 26 Minn. 317, 1879 Minn. LEXIS 253
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided December 30, 1879·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Berry, J.

This is, in effect, an appeal from an order of the district court for Nobles county, for judgment against a- garnishee. Gen. St. 1878, e. 66, § 197, enacts that any party to a garnishment proceeding, deeming himself aggrieved by any order or final judgment therein, may remove the same from a district court-to the supreme court, by appeal, in the same cases, in like manner, and with like effect as in a civil action.

That no appeal lies from an order for judgment in a civil action has been settled by several decisions of this court. Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 513; Rogers v. Holyoke, 14 Minn. 514; Searles v. Thompson, 18 Minn. 316; Ryan v. [318] Kranz, 25 Minn. 362; Langdon v. Thompson, 25 Minn. 509; Chesterson v. Munson, ante, p. 303. Though the point of non-appealability is not made by counsel, we cannot overlook it, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Croft v. Miller, 4 N.W. 45, 26 Minn. 317, 1879 Minn. LEXIS 253 (Mich. 1879).

4 N.W. 45 (Croft v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alfred v. Anderson
522 P.2d 79 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1974)
Fulton v. Okes
262 N.W. 570 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1935)
McClearn v. Arnold
217 N.W. 106 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1927)
Nikannis Co. v. City of Duluth
121 N.W. 212 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)
Krafve v. Roy
107 N.W. 966 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1906)
Cummings v. Edwards-Wood Co.
103 N.W. 709 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1905)
Duxbury v. Shanahan
87 N.W. 944 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1901)
St. Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham
69 N.W. 1077 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1897)
United States Savings, Loan & Building Co. v. Ahrens
52 N.W. 898 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1892)
McConnell v. Rakness
42 N.W. 539 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1889)