Lamb v. McCanna

14 Minn. 513
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 15, 1869·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

By- the Court

GileillaN, Oh. J.

In the court below all the defendants except McCanna made default; he answered and plaintiff replied. The cause came on for trial and after plaintiff had introduced his evidence and rested, McCanna moved on the pleadings that the action be dismissed as to him. The court sustained the motion, and plaintiff excepted. The ruling of the court was reduced to the form of an order of dismissal and entered, and from this order plaintiff appeals. The objection is made here that the order is not appealable. An appeal does not lie from the rulings or decisions of the district court made in the course of a trial; the appeal must be from the judgment, or from the order on a motion for a new trial. Von Glahn vs. Sommer, 11 Minn., 203; Hulett vs. Mattison, 12 Ib., 349.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 513 (Mich. 1869).

14 Minn. 513 (Lamb v. McCanna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Weber
28 L.R.A. 621 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
Owen v. McCormick
5 Mont. 255 (Montana Supreme Court, 1884)
Croft v. Miller
4 N.W. 45 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1879)
Ryan v. Kranz
25 Minn. 362 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1879)
Searles v. Thompson
18 Minn. 316 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1872)
Hodgins v. Heaney
15 Minn. 185 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1870)