United States Ex Rel. John A. Denie's Sons Co. v. Bass

111 F.2d 965, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3823
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMarch 12, 1940
Docket8196
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 111 F.2d 965 (United States Ex Rel. John A. Denie's Sons Co. v. Bass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Ex Rel. John A. Denie's Sons Co. v. Bass, 111 F.2d 965, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3823 (6th Cir. 1940).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In a suit in the name of the United States for the use and benefit of a subcontractor against the principal contractor and his sureties upon a bond for public work under Sec. 270a et seq., 40 U.S.C.A., tried to the court without a jury,

It appearing that the court overruled a claim of the use plaintiff on the ground that not having any contractual relationship express or implied with the principal contractor, he had not given the statutory written notice by registered mail as provided by Section 270b (a), and

It appearing to the court that no challenge is made by the appellant to the finding of fact of the District Judge as unsupported by evidence, and it appearing to us that there was no error in the conclusions of law arrived below, since it is the view of this court that the statutory requirement of notice being unequivocal and without ambiguity is a jurisdictional prerequisite governed by United States ex rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCord, 233 U.S. 157, 34 S.Ct. 550, 552, 58 L.Ed. 893, in that the present statute, as that there interpreted, likewise “creates a new liability and gives a special remedy for it, and upon well-settled principles the limitations upon such liability become a part of the right conferred, and compliance with them is made essential to the assertion and benefit of the liability itself”, and the court being further of the view that the decision in United States for Use of A. Bryant Co. v. New York Steam Fitting Co., 235 U.S. 327, 35 S.Ct. 108, 59 L.Ed. 253, does not militate against this conclusion,

It is hereby ordered that the judgment below be and it is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the Appeal of Harris
159 S.E.2d 539 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Fuller Industries, Inc. v. R. Terry Blazier & Son, Inc.
188 So. 2d 2 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
United States v. Gunnar Johnson & Son, Inc.
310 F.2d 899 (Eighth Circuit, 1963)
Hydrotherm, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North America
31 Misc. 2d 534 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance v. United States
217 F.2d 727 (Fifth Circuit, 1954)
United States v. Robbins
125 F. Supp. 25 (D. Massachusetts, 1954)
William Simpson Const. Co. v. Westover
100 F. Supp. 125 (S.D. California, 1951)
United States Ex Rel. Bruce Co. v. Fraser Const. Co.
87 F. Supp. 1 (W.D. Arkansas, 1949)
Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. v. Taylor
38 F. Supp. 159 (S.D. West Virginia, 1941)
United States ex rel. Birmingham Slag Co. v. Perry
115 F.2d 724 (Fifth Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
111 F.2d 965, 1940 U.S. App. LEXIS 3823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-john-a-denies-sons-co-v-bass-ca6-1940.