Turner v. State

342 S.W.3d 436, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 824, 2011 WL 2313698
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 689
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 2011·No. WD 71896·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Steven Turner appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Turner contends that the motion court erred because Turner established that his plea counsel failed to act as a reasonably competent attorney when plea counsel convinced Turner to plead guilty in reliance on being placed on probation and paying restitution. Instead, Turner was sentenced to a total of six years in prison. Turner claims he was prejudiced because his guilty plea was not entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Turner v. State, 342 S.W.3d 436, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 824, 2011 WL 2313698 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

342 S.W.3d 436 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

ESTATE OF BOWSER v. Meurer
342 S.W.3d 436 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)