Turner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

430 S.W.3d 339, 2014 WL 1850719, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 515

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 689 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 6, 2014·No. No. ED 99991·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Turner appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Antonio Turner appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Mo. R.Crim. P. 29.15 (2013). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2013).

Turner v. State, 430 S.W.3d 339, 2014 WL 1850719, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 515 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

430 S.W.3d 339 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.