Turner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

260 S.W.3d 912, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1183, 2008 WL 4051385

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 2, 2008

DocketED 90355

StatusPublished

This text of 260 S.W.3d 912 (Turner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Turner v. State, 260 S.W.3d 912, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1183, 2008 WL 4051385 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl A. Turner (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because plea counsel coerced his guilty plea by failing to be prepared for trial.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl A. Turner (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because plea counsel coerced his guilty plea by failing to be prepared for trial.

The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 S.W.3d 912, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1183, 2008 WL 4051385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/turner-v-state-moctapp-2008.