Turner v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Turner v. State

265 S.W.3d 348, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1314, 2008 WL 4387734

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Turner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 689 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 30, 2008·No. WD 68222·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Charles F. Turner appeals the circuit court’s judgment that denied his motion for post-conviction relief. After a jury trial, Appellant was convicted in *349 Johnson County Circuit Court of assault in the second degree, § 565.060, RSMo 2000. On appeal, Appellant raises a single Point Relied On, arguing that his trial counsel afforded him constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to call a particular witness to testify in support of his defense at trial.

We deny Appellant’s Point, and affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Charles F. Turner appeals the circuit court’s judgment that denied his motion for post-conviction relief. After a jury trial, Appellant was convicted in *349 Johnson County Circuit Court of assault in the second degree, § 565.060, RSMo 2000. On appeal, Appellant raises a single Point Relied On, arguing that his trial counsel afforded him constitutionally ineffective assistance by failing to call a particular witness to testify in support of his defense at trial.

We deny Appellant’s Point, and affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Turner v. State, 265 S.W.3d 348, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1314, 2008 WL 4387734 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

265 S.W.3d 348 (Turner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.