ESTATE OF BOWSER v. Meurer

342 S.W.3d 436
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 14, 2011
DocketWD 72597
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 342 S.W.3d 436 (ESTATE OF BOWSER v. Meurer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
ESTATE OF BOWSER v. Meurer, 342 S.W.3d 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

342 S.W.3d 436 (2011)

ESTATE OF Virginia BOWSER by and through Ronald BOWSER and Richard Bowser, Co-Personal Respresentatives, and Ronald Bowser, Individually, and Richard Bowser, Individually, Appellants,
v.
Michael F. MEURER, M.D., Thoracic & Vascular Surgeons and Thoracic & Vascular Surgeons, P.A., a Kansas Corporation, d/b/a Thoracic & Vascular Surgeons, P.C., Respondents.

No. WD 72597.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

June 14, 2011.

John H. Norton and Kathryn S. Perkins, Kansas City, MO, for Appellants.

Bruce Keplinger and John Hicks, Overland Park, KS, for Respondents.

Before Division II: JAMES M. SMART, JR., Presiding Judge, and MARK D. PFEIFFER and CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judges.

Order

PER CURIAM:

The Estate of Virginia Bowser and Ronald Bowser and Richard Bowser, individually and as co-personal representatives of the Estate (collectively, "Estate"), appeal from the Judgment on a jury verdict entered on March 30, 2010, in the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri ("trial court"), in favor of Michael F. Meurer, M.D. ("Meurer") and Thoracic & Vascular Surgeons, P.A on the Estate's claim of medical malpractice.

The Estate's sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying the Estate's pretrial motion to strike Meurer's medical expert. Dr. Hugh Burnett ("Burnett"), because Burnett's deposition testimony failed to apply the applicable standard of care to his medical opinions, even though Burnett testified live at trial without objection and, at such time, did testify according to the applicable standard of care for providing medical opinions in Missouri. We affirm in this per curiam order and have provided the parties a legal memorandum explaining our ruling. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. State
342 S.W.3d 436 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 S.W.3d 436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/estate-of-bowser-v-meurer-moctapp-2011.