Torres v. Diaz

District Court, S.D. California·Decided October 6, 2021·No. 3:19-cv-01964·Unknown

Opinion

EDUARDO TORRES, Case No.: 19cv1964 LAB (JLB)

Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY [Dkt. 82] RALPH DIAZ, Secretary, et al., Respondents. Petitioner Eduardo Torres has moved for a certificate of appealability with respect to Magistrate Judge Burkhardt’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) which, in relevant part, denied Torres’s motion for leave to amend, and the Court’s March 23, 2021 Order adopting that portion of the R&R. (Dkt. 82). Rule 11, 28 U.S.C.A. foll. § 2254, governs certificates of appealability for habeas corpus petitions brought, as this one was, under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.1 Rule 11 requires the Court to “issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant.” But the Court’s order wasn’t a “final order” susceptible to appeal. An order is “final” if it “ends the litigation on the merits

1 Torres’ motion seeks a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, which applies to petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. §2255. While the Court can’t apply § 2253 to Torres’ petition, the analysis and result under that statute would be the and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute judgment.” Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund of Intern. Union of Operating Eng’rs & Participating Emp’rs, 571 U.S. 177, 183 (2014). The order that Torres seeks to appeal didn’t do that—despite the denial of leave to amend, his initial and still-operative petition has live claims and the litigation is ongoing. (See Dkt. 50; Dkt. 51; Dkt. 90 (U.S. Court of Appeals order stating that the Court “has not issued any orders that are final or appealable”)). Torres’ Motion for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. At the time he filed his petition, Torres was housed at Salinas Valley State Prison. Based on more recent filings—and the return as undeliverable of several recent documents—it appears he is presently incarcerated at the California Health Care Facility in Stockton, California. (See, e.g., ECF Nos. 82; 89; 92.) The Clerk is ORDERED to modify the docket to reflect Torres’ current address and direct all further correspondence with Petitioner to: BD8991, California Health Care Facility, P.O. Box 32110, Stockton, CA 95213. Torres is ORDERED to file a notice of change of address if his address changes again.

DATED: October 6, 2021 ________________________________ Hon. Larry Alan Burns United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torres v. Diaz, (S.D. Cal. 2021).

Torres v. Diaz (Torres v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related