Timothy Nelson v. Dorn Shuffman Diane McFarland Karen Adams Alan Blake Martha Bellew-Smith Linda Meade

476 F.3d 635, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620, 2007 WL 174395
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2007·No. 06-3773·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Timothy Nelson appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. The district court’s denial of counsel is affirmed at this time, but the denial is without prejudice to Timothy Nelson’s right to renew his request for counsel as the case progresses. In any future orders which may deny requests for counsel, the district court is directed to state in more detail its reasons for doing so. See Slaughter v. City of Maplewood, 731 F.2d 587, 589 (8th Cir.1984) (discussing the need for the record to reveal “whether the district court exercised a reasoned and well-informed discretion, so as to permit ... review for abuse of discretion”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Timothy Nelson v. Dorn Shuffman Diane McFarland Karen Adams Alan Blake Martha Bellew-Smith Linda Meade, 476 F.3d 635, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 1620, 2007 WL 174395 (8th Cir. 2007).

476 F.3d 635 (Timothy Nelson v. Dorn Shuffman Diane McFarland Karen Adams Alan Blake Martha Bellew-Smith Linda Meade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kevin Ward v. Bradley Smith
Eighth Circuit, 2013
Javier Pena-Calleja v. Melissa Ring
720 F.3d 988 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
Eugene Jones-El v. Dave Dormire
391 F. App'x 569 (Eighth Circuit, 2010)
Anthony Lane v. Michael Astrue
279 F. App'x 421 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Walker v. Bowersox
526 F.3d 1186 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
John Dasta v. Bobby Shearin
230 F. App'x 635 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)
Hollis Larson v. David Crist
223 F. App'x 536 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)