Donald Winnett v. Saline County Jail

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 6, 2009
Docket08-1690
StatusUnpublished

This text of Donald Winnett v. Saline County Jail (Donald Winnett v. Saline County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Donald Winnett v. Saline County Jail, (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 08-1690 ___________

Donald Felix Winnett, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Saline County Jail; Hugh Gentry, Lt., * Saline County Jail, originally sued as * Appeal from the United States Huge Gentry; Dru Reed, Sgt., Saline * District Court for the County Jail, originally sued only as * Eastern District of Arkansas. Reed; Ray Pennington, Sgt., Saline * County Jail, originally sued only as * [UNPUBLISHED] Pennington; Chad Westbrook, Jailer, * Saline County Jail, originally sued only * as Westbrook; Brandon Ford, Jailer, * Saline County Jail originally sued only * as Ford; Dan Sutterfield, Detective, * Arresting Officer; John Doe, Arresting * Officer, * * Appellees. * ___________

Submitted: March 6, 2009 Filed: March 6, 2009 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM. In this interlocutory appeal, Arkansas inmate Donald Winnett contests the district court’s1 denial without prejudice of his motion for appointment of counsel in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit.

We find no abuse of discretion. See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review; there is no statutory or constitutional right to appointed counsel in civil case). The district court’s order reflects consideration of appropriate factors such as the factual complexity of the issues, Winnett’s ability to investigate the facts and present his claims, and the complexity of the legal arguments. See Nelson v. Shuffman, 476 F.3d 635, 636 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam); Phillips, 437 F.3d at 794. Moreover, the denial was without prejudice, so the court may revisit the decision at a later time if appropriate. We reject Winnett’s suggestion of judicial bias. See United States v. Dehghani, 550 F.3d 716, 721 (8th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Winnett’s motion on appeal for appointment of counsel. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Donald Winnett v. Saline County Jail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/donald-winnett-v-saline-county-jail-ca8-2009.