Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Tibero v. State

Tibero v. State

646 So. 2d 213, 1994 WL 406151
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 16, 1994
Docket94-392
StatusPublished
Cited by53 cases

This text of 646 So. 2d 213 (Tibero v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tibero v. State, 646 So. 2d 213, 1994 WL 406151 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

646 So.2d 213 (1994)

Ronald TIBERO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 94-392.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 16, 1994.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and James T. Cook, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Belle B. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

OPINION ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We granted the State's motion for rehearing in this cause and, because there is a recurring problem in the trial court's grant of costs in criminal cases, we elect to consider this case en banc. After considering the supplemental briefing and en banc oral argument, we conclude, as did the original panel, that the assessment by the trial court of a $48.00 deposit to First Step of Volusia County, Inc. is beyond the authority of the court.

We are unable to agree with the State that the court's inherent authority justifies this award. While we agree that the court has inherent authority to order those things "that are reasonably necessary for the administration of justice within the scope of its jurisdiction,"[1] the deposit to First Step simply does not meet this condition. The State presented no other authority for the assessment. The requirement for such deposit, therefore, is stricken from the conditions of probation.

In all other respects, the judgment and order of probation are affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

HARRIS, C.J., and DAUKSCH, COBB, W. SHARP, GOSHORN, PETERSON, GRIFFIN, DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

[1] Rose v. Palm Beach County, 361 So.2d 135 (Fla. 1978).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Children & Families v. D.T.
808 So. 2d 1282 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Duncan v. State
703 So. 2d 1069 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Bruce v. State
687 So. 2d 1322 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Cox v. State
687 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Allen v. State
676 So. 2d 491 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Wilkes v. State
675 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Robinson v. State
675 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Braggs v. State
671 So. 2d 304 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
McClough v. State
669 So. 2d 1099 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Dobson v. State
665 So. 2d 386 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Young v. State
663 So. 2d 1376 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Smith v. State
661 So. 2d 425 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Adams v. State
660 So. 2d 1187 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Mosely v. State
659 So. 2d 1342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Norris v. State
659 So. 2d 1352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Meier v. State
659 So. 2d 1363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McClendon v. State
659 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Conner v. State
658 So. 2d 1239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Miller v. State
658 So. 2d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Gibson v. State
660 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
646 So. 2d 213, 1994 WL 406151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tibero-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.