Department of Children & Families v. D.T.

808 So. 2d 1282, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2917, 2002 WL 360294
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 2002
DocketNo. 5D01-1764
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 808 So. 2d 1282 (Department of Children & Families v. D.T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Children & Families v. D.T., 808 So. 2d 1282, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2917, 2002 WL 360294 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PLEUS, J.

The Department of Children and Families appeals an “Order on Parents’ Motion for Sanctions,” which awarded attorney’s fees and required “Representatives of the Department, not the Attorneys or their staff’ to perform 1000 hours community service or pay a $1,000 fine to the Family Visitation Center in Ocala, Florida. We reverse.

Because the lower court was proceeding under its contempt power to punish the Department for violating a court order, it should have followed the procedure required by Rule 8.285(b), Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure (2001). The court failed to issue an order to show cause as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.285(b)(1). See Acevedo v. Dept, of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 668 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Additionally, although we agree that the Department violated the court’s [1283]*1283order to file and serve the predisposition report no later than five days before the hearing, the court sanctioned the wrong parties. It is clear from the record that the Department attorneys were responsible for filing and serving the report on time but failed to do so. However, the court’s order specifically exempts the Department attorneys from paying the fine or performing the community service.

Finally, we find that the lower court exceeded its inherent authority in ordering the fines to be made payable to the Family Visitation Center. See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

REVERSED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Department of Children and Family v. Jb
898 So. 2d 980 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
808 So. 2d 1282, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2917, 2002 WL 360294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-children-families-v-dt-fladistctapp-2002.