Conner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Conner v. State

658 So. 2d 1239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8712, 1995 WL 490564

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Conner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 6601 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 18, 1995·No. No. 94-1518·Published

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Because the written sentence imposed in this case conflicts directly with the explicit pronouncement at the sentencing hearing, we reverse for resentencing. See Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

We reverse also the assessment to First Step, Inc. See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, Judge.

Because the written sentence imposed in this case conflicts directly with the explicit pronouncement at the sentencing hearing, we reverse for resentencing. See Wilkins v. State, 543 So.2d 800 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).

We reverse also the assessment to First Step, Inc. See Tibero v. State, 646 So.2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Conner v. State, 658 So. 2d 1239, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8712, 1995 WL 490564 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

658 So. 2d 1239 (Conner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related