Conner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Conner v. State

685 So. 2d 65, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13237, 1996 WL 727141

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 19, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2133

StatusPublished

This text of 685 So. 2d 65 (Conner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Conner v. State, 685 So. 2d 65, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13237, 1996 WL 727141 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order imposing restitution. We strike that portion of the [66]*66order by which the appellant was ordered to pay $2142.35 for the costs of removing illegally dumped tires from private property. We do so because restitution for this pui’pose was neither ordered within sixty days of sentencing nor agreed to in the appellant’s negotiated plea. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993).

The order is othenvise affirmed.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order imposing restitution. We strike that portion of the [66]*66order by which the appellant was ordered to pay $2142.35 for the costs of removing illegally dumped tires from private property. We do so because restitution for this pui’pose was neither ordered within sixty days of sentencing nor agreed to in the appellant’s negotiated plea. See State v. Sanderson, 625 So.2d 471 (Fla.1993).

The order is othenvise affirmed.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

685 So. 2d 65, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 13237, 1996 WL 727141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/conner-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack