Conner v. State
734 So. 2d 1191, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8927, 1999 WL 445801
Opinion
Randy Conner appeals his sentence arguing that the trial court improperly enhanced the terms of his probation. However, Mr. Conner made no objection to the enhancement at the sentencing hearing nor did he file a motion to correct his sentence. Thus, his claim of error has not been preserved for appellate review. See § 924.051, Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Conner v. State, 734 So. 2d 1191, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8927, 1999 WL 445801 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
734 So. 2d 1191 (Conner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Levine v. Levine
734 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)