Thompson v. State

840 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2402, 2003 WL 554492
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 2003·No. No. 5D02-3098·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PLEUS, J.

The defendant seeks review of an order denying his motion to modify his community control and probation. The motion was addressed to the condition that the defendant visit his psychiatrist twice monthly and sought to reduce this requirement on the basis that it was no longer necessary. See § 948.03(6), Fla. Stat. (2002). A trial court’s decision to reduce or ameliorate a lawful condition of community control or probation is entirely a matter of grace for which an appeal will not lie. Burgos v. State, 765 So.2d 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Langley v. State, 721 So.2d 1264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 840 So. 2d 352, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2402, 2003 WL 554492 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

840 So. 2d 352 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. M.R.T.
848 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Hawn v. State
840 So. 2d 352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)