Thompson v. State
772 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15400, 2000 WL 1742457
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 2000·No. No. 1D98-2500·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant, Willard D. Thompson (Thompson), timely filed a motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. However, the motion was facially deficient in that it failed to contain an oath as required by the rule. Accordingly, we affirm, but without prejudice to file a properly sworn amended motion in the trial court within thirty days of the issuance of this court’s mandate.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. State, 772 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 15400, 2000 WL 1742457 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
772 So. 2d 582 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. State
942 So. 2d 451 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Dependable Component Supply, Inc. v. Pace Electronics, Inc.
772 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)