Thompson v. State

802 So. 2d 503, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18276, 2001 WL 1643865
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2001·No. No. 4D00-4369·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion to withdraw his plea. We remand for resentencing. The state concedes, and we agree, that it was error for the trial court to sentence appellant in absentia. See Barcelo v. State, 774 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(holding that the appellant is entitled to be present at sentencing whether the sentencing is the immediate result of an adjudication or the result of a successful 3.850 challenge).1

AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR RE-SENTENCING.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 802 So. 2d 503, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18276, 2001 WL 1643865 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

802 So. 2d 503 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. State
802 So. 2d 503 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)