Thompson v. State

802 So. 2d 503, 2001 WL 1644171
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 731 So. 2d 819
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 26, 2001·No. No. 4D01-1496·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a resentencing under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The public defender filed an An-ders brief in Kevin Thompson’s appeal, advising that it presented no meritorious issues warranting reversal.1 Supplemental briefing has revealed that when resentenc-ing Thompson, the trial court was divested of jurisdiction due to a pending related direct appeal.2 See Knapp v. State, 741 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Landers v. State, 691 So.2d 550 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

As we state in Thompson v. State, 802 So.2d 503 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), appellant must be present at resentencing. We, therefore, vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

KLEIN, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 802 So. 2d 503, 2001 WL 1644171 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

802 So. 2d 503 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Knapp v. State
741 So. 2d 1150 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Landers v. State
691 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Thompson v. State
802 So. 2d 503 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)