Thompson v. State

764 So. 2d 612, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12716, 1999 WL 767419
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1999·No. No. 98-3579·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rollinson v. State, 748 So.2d 585 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Young v. State, 719 So.2d 1010 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 727 So.2d 915 (Fla.1999); State v. Vixamar, 687 So.2d 300 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (holding no constitutional right to enforce plea bargain); Winokur v. State, 605 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (holding that a defendant is not constitutionally entitled to a plea bargain); Jesus v. State, 565 So.2d 1361, 1365 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“[I]f sentence is within the limits prescribed by the Legislature, we have no jurisdiction to interfere.”) (quoting Banks v. State, 342 So.2d 469, 470 (Fla.1976)).

GUNTHER, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 764 So. 2d 612, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 12716, 1999 WL 767419 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

764 So. 2d 612 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baez v. State
747 So. 2d 415 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Terranova v. State
764 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)