Thompson v. State

744 So. 2d 527, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13452
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 13, 1999·No. Nos. 98-707, 98-581·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the appellant’s convictions and sentences for armed robbery and unlawful use of a firearm during the commission of a felony. With the exception of the appellant’s conviction and sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony which the state properly concedes must be stricken and vacated as being violative of the due process clause where it stemmed from the commission of a single act, see Cleveland v. State, 587 So.2d 1145, 1146 (Fla.1991); Davis v. State, 710 So.2d 723,-724 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), we find no merit to the remaining points on appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm the appellant’s convictions and sentences for armed robbery but strike and vacate his conviction and sentence for the unlawful use of a firearm during the commission of a felony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 744 So. 2d 527, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13452 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

744 So. 2d 527 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bufford v. State
803 So. 2d 914 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)